Nnamdi Kanu’s Family Criticizes President Tinubu For Breaking Their Agreement With Seyi

The family of Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has criticized President Bola Tinubu for allegedly failing to fulfill an agreement made before the 2023 general election.

In a statement on Thursday, Kanu’s brother, Prince Emmanuel Kanu, revealed that Seyi Tinubu, with his father’s approval, met with him in Abuja prior to the elections.

According to him, they agreed during the meeting that IPOB would not boycott the polls in exchange for Nnamdi Kanu’s release if Tinubu won the presidency.

Prince Emmanuel expressed disappointment, stating that nearly two years into Tinubu’s presidency, his brother remains in detention.

He noted that this is despite Justice Binta Nyako recusing herself from the case and earlier court rulings, including an Appeal Court decision discharging Kanu of charges and ordering his release.

The IPOB leader’s brother explained that Seyi Tinubu assured him that any commitments made during their discussion were endorsed by his father.

According to him, based on this assurance, IPOB chose not to interfere with the elections and upheld its commitment to democratic principles.

Prince Emmanuel lamented that, despite these efforts, Kanu remains in detention without any charges, calling the situation a betrayal of trust.

He also criticized the Nigerian judiciary, accusing it of using technicalities to delay the case instead of addressing the substantive issues.

The statement read: “Before the last election, I received a message from an ex-governor that Seyi the son of President Tinubu wanted to see me. I agreed to meet with him on the condition that the overriding priority and hence the fulcrum of our discussion will be the release of my brother.

“The meeting was held in Abuja in the presence of another individual whom I asked along to witness the deliberations and if need be provide independent verification should the need arise.

“Seyi confirmed to me that his father sanctioned the meeting and that I should consider any agreement we reach as binding on the then candidate Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

“In good faith we agreed that I shall relay the outcome to my brother to reinforce the long held tradition of IPOB not interfering with the conduct of elections, either through boycott or any other form of civil disobedience.

“This understanding was duly communicated to my brother and he reaffirmed his commitment not to stop the elections or order any boycott.

“When President Tinubu as a candidate visited Owerri during his campaign, he too reiterated his commitment to facilitate the release of my brother if elected. We took his public statement as a tacit reaffirmation of the understanding I reached with his son Seyi.

“At the end, IPOB did not call for election boycott despite having the capacity to do so. IPOB also made sure that discordant voices urging election boycott were overcome because election boycotts would not reflect well on the reputation of a global movement that prides itself on adherence to democratic tenets.

“It therefore, defies logic that nearly two years after President Tinubu assumed the mantle of leadership in Nigeria, my brother is still in detention despite not having any charge against him.

“It’s been over three months now that Justice Binta Nyako recused herself from the case yet no new judge has been assigned the case.

“This is on top of the fact that Appeal Court had earlier discharged him of the sham charges and ordered his release which the previous regime of Buhari declined to obey.

“Supreme Court determination that his bail ought not to have been revoked has been ignored by the courts and the government.

“The latest insult is that Abuja courts of all persuasion are no longer willing to determine the case of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu on merit but are rather relying on ludicrous and inapplicable technicalities to stall the timely determination of his cases.

“The truth is that Nigerian courts cannot, will not and do not have both the substantive and procedural jurisdiction to try him. His detention is without the backing of any known law in Nigeria or elsewhere in the world.

“It’s a shame that those who claim to be men of honour cannot honour their word.”

KanyiDaily recalls that the President-General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo Worldwide, Fidelis Chukwu, recently urged the Nigerian government to release Nnamdi Kanu.