A bill seeking a six-year single term for president, governors, national assembly and state assembly members did not scale second reading at the House of Representatives on Tuesday, December 17, 2019.
KanyiDaily had reported that the bill was sponsored by reps member, John Dyegh, of the All Progressive Congress (APC) from Benue State.
Presenting the bill, John Dyegh had said a single term for political office holders would allow them to have more experience instead of being rejected or re-elected every four years.
“Indeed even if you do only one term, you know that you have contributed six years and it will make more sense than this four years tenure,” he said.
He also argued that re-election of public officers cost three times more than the first election and is characterised by violence. He believes a single term of years will curb the irregularities associated with re-election.
When Deputy Speaker Ahmed Wase later put the bill to voice vote for second reading, members rejected it, instead they pushed for a credible electoral process.
The lawmakers argued that the President or governor will be unable to make meaningful achievements if restricted to just a six year single term.
Former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, has expressed displeasure with the speed with which the six-year single term proposal was rejected by the House of Reps.
In a statement issued by his Media Adviser, Mr Paul Ibe, on Tuesday, December 17, 2019, Atiku said that he was disappointed by the fact that the lawmakers had thrown away the baby with the bath water at the expense of the larger interest of the country.
Atiku said that in view of the challenges facing Nigeria current democratic order, especially the culture of rigging that subverts the will of the people, six-year single term would have ended such untoward practices in its electoral process.
“The desperation for second term by the incumbents is the main reason why they go for broke and set the rule book on fire, thereby making free and fair elections impossible by legitimising rigging at the expense of their challengers that have no access to public funds.
“A situation where the incumbents deploy more public resources to their second term projects than using the funds for people’s welfare encourages massive rigging that undermines electoral integrity.“Six-year single term would remove such desperation and enable the incumbents to concentrate on the job for which they were elected in the first place.”Abubakar regretted that eight-year term of office rewards incompetence because even incumbents that have failed would use their access to public funds to return to power by fair or foul means.
“I don’t agree with the logic that eight years would give elected leaders better opportunity to fulfill their campaign promises.“An inherently incompetent incumbent will perform below average even if you give him/her 20 years in office or give him or her $20 billion dollars,” Abubakar stressed.
According to him, it is not how long a man spends in office, but how well he is adequately prepared for the job.
He argued that the desperation for second term was not necessarily driven by patriotism or the passion for service, but by the obsession with the greed for power for its own sake.
“Second term obsession rewards incompetence by allowing failed incumbents to be reelected regardless of their performance record.
“It also denies political parties the opportunity to replace failed incumbents with better candidates within the parties in the name of right of first refusal.”
The former vice president said that the rejection of the six-year single term was a mistake because little attention was paid to its merits.
Abubakar said that eight years tenure of four years each sacrificed merit because the incumbents were automatically entitled to re-election regardless of their performance records.He was, however, of the view that current holders of the offices under the proposed constitutional review should not be entitled to a six-year term at the expiration of their second term.